Talecris New Trials Support (Talents) Program
Talecris Biotherapeutics
All Regions
08/01/2008
$300,000

The Talents Program

Letters of Intent (LOI) for the next round of awards are due by August 1, 2008. Disbursements of grants will begin early in January 2009.

The Talents Program has three key aims:

Further the understanding of the efficacy and mechanisms of action of IGIV in current clinical indications
Explore new clinical uses of IGIV
Support the intellectual endeavors of the IGIV research community.
Grants are awarded on an annual basis and are usually for either a 1- or 2-year period. Grants can include support for salary, overheads and direct costs. Product may also be provided if requested.

The program awards up to $1 million a year. Individual grants can be up to $150,000 per research project per annum, excluding product costs. The maximum funding available per research project is therefore $300,000 awarded over a 2-year period.

The funding cycle takes place on an annual basis. Letters of Intent are reviewed in August, funding is determined in October, and funding begins in January of the following year.

How to Apply
The Application Process
Applications are made in two steps. The first step requires the completion of a Letter of Intent, of which there are two versions: one for basic science projects and one for clinical research projects.

Letters of Intent will be reviewed by The Talents Evaluation Committee, which includes experts in neurology, immunology, hematology, and other disciplines as needed, as well as Talecris scientists.

Investigators who submit Letters of Intent that are approved by the Talents Evaluation Committee will be asked to complete a full application form, which will be emailed to those applicants.

As with the Letters of Intent, the completed applications will be reviewed by members of the Talents Evaluation Committee; and the committee will determine which proposals will be funded.

Each application will be reviewed based on the following set of criteria:

Scientific merit
Qualifications of applicant
Quality of environment
Alignment with program goals.

All proposals that meet minimum criteria in the above categories will be ranked and funded until the allotted funds are exhausted.

Who Should Apply?
Applications are welcome from individuals with an MD, PhD, DO or PharmD who are affiliated with a facility that utilizes IGIV in a basic or clinical science research setting or to treat patients. Such facilities may include, but are not limited to, universities, hospitals, clinics, blood centers, and laboratories.

For-profit organizations are not eligible for funding under the Talents Program, e.g. pharmaceutical companies, homecare companies, health maintenance organizations. If you require additional information, please contact the Program Administrator at: talents@porterhouse.biz.

Clinical Pharmacist, Immunologist, Neurologist, Physician Researcher, Hematologist, Scientist
Clinical Research Training Grant
Muscular Dystrophy Association
All Regions
08/01/2008
$180,000

Muscular Dystrophy Association

Clinical Research Training Grant (CRTG)

Summary: The CRTG is designed to provide promising young clinicians the research training opportunities needed to become productive clinical investigators in neuromuscular disease research. This training opportunity is designed to be compatible with the requirements of a traditional clinical fellowship in neuromuscular disease and any forthcoming requirements for certification in neuromuscular disease. Trainees will be expected to design their own educational plans and to participate, under the supervision of a mentor, in the development and/or coordination of a clinical research project. At minimum, trainees should gain experience in the basic epidemiological methods of clinical research, ethical and legal issues, and the principles involved in monitoring patient-oriented research, including regulatory requirements and quality assurance. Recipients are also encouraged to acquire knowledge of and exposure to research technologies, large dataset management, bioinformatics and other research tools, as well as to develop the communication and collaboration skills necessary for successful investigator development. Clinical Research Training Grants will be awarded annually to no more than two qualified recipients for the amount of $90,000 per year for two years.

Deadlines*

*Potential applicants are strongly encouraged to contact MDA staff before submitting a letter of intent for this grant.

2009:
Letter of Intent: August 1, 2008
Grant Application: September 1, 2008
Start Date: July 1, 2009

FOR ONLINE SUBMISSION OF THE "REQUEST FOR GRANT APPLICATiON" go to: https://proposalcentral.altum.com

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the funding level and percent commitment for this grant?
This Fellowship is funded at up to $90,000 per year, with a cap of $85,000 to be applied to salary and benefits, and a cap of $10,000 to be applied to coursework, travel and a laptop computer. Applicants are expected to commit 100% of their time to this Fellowship.

Who can apply?
To apply for the CRTG, you must hold a Doctor of Medicine or Doctor of Osteopathy degree and be licensed to practice medicine in the state or province in which the grant will be given; be board eligible or board certified in neurology, child neurology or physical medicine and rehabilitation at the time of the award. Clinicians who have been in a practice focused on neuromuscular diseases for not more than 5 years are also eligible to submit an application. See the CRTG Policy Manual for further requirements.

Do you need to be a U.S. citizen to apply?
U.S. or Canadian citizens, resident aliens, or nonresident aliens with a valid employment authorization are eligible for this training opportunity. Strong preference will be given to applicants who intend to remain in the U.S. or Canada after completing training.

How are applications reviewed?
Applications are reviewed by members of MDA’s Medical Advisory Committee (MAC) at its October meeting. Review criteria include: quality of applicant; quality of mentor and training environment; and quality of educational plan. See the CRTG Policy Manual for more detail.

How many grants are awarded each year?
No more than two grants will be awarded annually.

How should the “classwork” requirement be met?
Applicants are asked to design an “educational program” including formal classwork in clinical research. The classwork requirement can be satisfied through many different mechanisms including classes in relevant areas offered at the applicant’s own institution or classes offered by government or private organizations, or some combination of both. Both certificate and credit hour classes may be counted toward the educational requirement. Examples of appropriate topics for classwork include, but are not limited to epidemiology, ethics/responsible conduct of research, study design/clinical trials design, use of human subjects, scientific writing/grantsmanship, and good clinical practice. Your application will be reviewed, in part, on the breadth and depth of the educational plan that you develop.

What is meant by "development or coordination of a clinical research project"?
Your second-year project should allow you to apply information that you gained from the first-year coursework in a clinical research setting. Planning for this project should begin in year one. Appropriate projects might include, for example, participating in a clinical trial, conducting a restrospective chart review study, or designing and implementing a small epidemiological study. Your role in the design, execution, and/or data anaylsis for the research project should be clearly delineated. The project should not be a laboratory research project. It is expected that a publication or presentation at a scientific meeting will result from the research project.

Is this program compatible with certification in neuromuscular disease?
Certification requirements for neuromuscular training are currently under development. This fellowship is meant to be compatible with requirements for such certification. If you plan to seek certification in neuromuscular training, please indicate this in your applicant statement and educational plan, and include the requirements for certification in your educational plan.

How will progress be judged?
Progress reports will be required at six months, twelve months and eighteen months. Applicants who are not judged to be making satisfactory progress will be subject to cancellation.

Contact:
Elizabeth Habeeb-Louks
MDA Research Department
(520) 529-2000, ext. 6021
crtg@mdausa.org

Neurologist, Osteopath, Physiatrist , Physician, Physician Researcher
Major Research Grants for Senior Researcher: Follicular Lymphoma Research Initiative
Lymphoma Research Foundation
All Regions
08/01/2008
$750,000
3-Year (2009-12)
Follicular Lymphoma Research Initiative Grant
Guidelines and General Instructions for Application
KEY DATES:
Application Release Date: June 1, 2008
Letter-of-Intent Receipt Date: August 1, 2008
Application Receipt Date: September 10, 2008
Peer Review Dates: September 19 – Oct 17, 2008
Applicant Notification Date: March 2009
Earliest Project Start Date: July 1, 2009
SUMMARY:
The Lymphoma Research Foundation (LRF) seeks
innovative proposals for its LRF Follicular
Lymphoma Initiative. The goal of this LRF initiative
is to develop novel therapeutic strategies for the
treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL). To
accomplish this, the LRF seeks proposals that
advance the understanding of the human biology of
follicular lymphoma or that verify molecular targets
for follicular lymphoma therapeutics. The LRF also
believes that coordination of efforts in the
development of therapeutics is needed to accelerate
the pace of research in follicular lymphoma.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES:
Proposals are welcome in all areas related to follicular lymphoma including etiology,
prevention, pathogenesis, novel therapeutics, translational research including genomics,
proteomics, or biomarkers, clinical trials and outcomes studies. However, the LRF is
particularly interested in receiving proposals in the following areas in follicular
lymphoma:
1. Advancing the understanding of the human biology of follicular lymphoma;
o Understanding of how drug and antibody resistance develops in follicular
lymphoma
o Understanding why aggressive transformation occurs
o Developing ways to prevent aggressive transformation
2. Verifying molecular targets in pre-clinical models for follicular lymphoma
therapeutics;
o Develop assays to measure human FL tumors
o Develop preclinical models that mimic human FL
o Identify or validate molecular targets in human FL tumors or preclinical
models
o Targets to characterize in FL may include, but are not limited to, kinases and
signal transduction pathways, novel cellular targets for development of
monoclonal antibodies, developmental and differentiation pathways, protein
degradation pathways and the proteasome, or transcriptional regulation
ELIGIBILITY:
All principal investigators holding an academic faculty appointment, at non-profit
organizations, or public or private institutions such as universities, colleges, hospitals,
and laboratories, may apply for funding through the LRF Follicular Lymphoma
Initiative. For-profit entities are not eligible to apply for LRF funds, however, should
one of these types of institutions have a relevant therapeutic or research project, they
should contact LRF management to discuss possible public-private partnerships.
APPLICATION PROCESS:
LRF requires prospective applicants to submit a letter of intent (LOI) in order to be
eligible to submit a full proposal. Proposals submitted without a LOI will not be
reviewed. The LOI should include the following:
• Cover letter including name, address, and telephone number of the PI, other key
personnel, and participating institutions;
• Abstract of proposed project, including descriptive title (please do not exceed 350
words);
• Applicant's biosketch.
LRF will perform a preliminary review of these materials to confirm eligibility and the
appropriateness of the proposed research project.
All interested applicants must submit their LOIs online through proposalCENTRAL
(https://proposalcentral.altum.com ) by August 1, 2008.
The full LRF application will be available in early August only for those individuals who
successfully submit a letter of intent by the deadline and are confirmed to be eligible.
MECHANISM OF SUPPORT:
Applications may not exceed $250,000 per year total costs, including indirect costs.
Proposals may be for up to 3-years in duration. The LRF intends to fund 2 applications
for this special research initiative.
Biologist, Cell Biologist, Hematologist, Molecular Biologist , Oncologist, Physician Researcher
Association for Laboratory Automation Innovation Award
Association for Laboratory Automation
All Regions
08/11/2008
$10,000
ALA Innovation Award

…recognizing laboratory innovation and technology advancement

Mission Statement
The ALA Innovation Award recognizes the work of those unique and special podium presentations at the LabAutomation conference and exhibition that are exceedingly innovative, contributes to the exploration of technologies in the laboratory, and comprises independence of thought, clarity of vision, extraordinary technical originality, and seminal integration and automation strategies. The ALA Innovation Award program also is in furtherance of the mission of the organization — which is to support the advancement and education of laboratory automation technologies worldwide.

What are we looking for?
The ALA is searching for podium presentations from academia, government and industry broadly consisting of innovative advances such as:
a fundamental study to develop new technology for the laboratory,
a new application of technology to laboratory automation, or
a use of technology to solve a unique problem.

Award
The award consists of a $10,000 check presentation to the winning presenting author (see rules and regulations: monetary disbursement). Subject to ALA requirements and the Board of Director's approval, the winning presenting author also (1) becomes a member of the judging panel for the next year, and (2) is invited to participate on the Scientific Committee for the following year's LabAutomation Conference. The award winning work will be featured in an issue of JALA following the conference. From this point forward, the presenting author may also be referred to as the "candidate."
Participation/Presentation at ACHEMA 2009
New for LabAutomation2009, DECHEMA, The Society for Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology of Frankfurt, Germany, will participate in the ALA Innovation Award Program. Qualifying LabAutomation2009 Innovation Award Finalists will travel to Frankfurt, Germany, May 11-15, 2009 to present their work at ACHEMA 2009. Expenses for those finalists (Up to 10 presenters) will be paid for by ALA and DECHEMA.2

The Panel of Judges
The panel of judges comprises individuals approved by the Board of Directors and represents the various technologies and applications within the LabAutomation Conference curriculum.
The ALA President only votes to break any ties when all scoring is final. Judges may not have or have had any formal association with the candidates - either direct or indirect. Judges must recuse themselves from evaluating any candidate wherein there exists a relationship such as family, business, financial or other, e.g. academic, student/profession association. Judges must sign a non-conflict of interest certification form ensuring no improper purposes. It is expected that any issues are declared by the judges. The Chairman makes the final determination on any questionable issues.

Presentation Evaluation
Selecting the winner of the ALA Innovation Award is based on a three-tiered evaluation system:
Selection of the LabAutomation Podium Presentations
In assembling the program for LabAutomation, the Scientific Committee selects qualifying podium presentations from the abstracts received in response to the Call for Papers. To qualify for entry into the ALA Innovation Award contest, an abstract must be received prior to the Call for Papers deadline.

Preliminary Screening
Working from the conference's selected abstracts, the panel of judge's scores all the abstracts thereby identifying the ALA Innovation Award Finalists for evaluation at LabAutomation. The panel of judges' reviews only those podium presentations selected and slotted for the conference by the ALA Scientific Committee. Short course instructors, poster presenters, and plenary speakers are not eligible. All candidates must adhere to the ALA Abstract Submission policies, timelines, rules and regulations1.
Here's how the preliminary screening works:
The Scientific Committee selects podium presentations for LabAutomation. The judges (not including the ALA President) are assigned to review and score the abstracts. (See "Scoring" below). The Chairman assigns all abstracts for evaluation to the panel of judges. Each of the podium presentations will be scored by a minimum of two judges. Upon completion of the first scoring phase, the Judging Panel will convene by teleconference to select the Top 20 to 25 Candidate presentations. These Top Candidates will be offered the opportunity to submit an extended abstract for review by the panel. An extended abstract is strongly encouraged by the Judging Panel to allow better differentiation of the leading candidates. Failure to submit information in time for the next selection phase will jeopardize the author's chances for inclusion in the finalists.
Upon completion of this second phase the ALA Innovation Award Panel of Judges will announce the Innovation Award Finalists to compete for the award at the LabAutomation Conference.

Request for Additional Information:
As part of the preliminary screening process, and in coordination with Chairman and panel, a candidate author may be contacted to ask further questions.

Judging of Presentations at LabAutomation
The judging panel will attend and evaluate each of the candidate's presentations and will collectively select the winner of the ALA Innovation Award. In scoring the presentations the judges will consider the following:

Impact on Laboratory Automation
Will this work make a noticeable contribution to the field of Laboratory Automation; will it substantially reduce the cost, change the workflow, or improve the quality of laboratory processes? Is the method robust enough to allow routine implementation? Will it have widespread adoption over the next 10 years? Did the presenter explain why he/she was doing the research and who will benefit from this research/technology? Would this advancement only benefit a small group of people, or could it have far reaching/global impact and change laboratory automation as we know it?

Originality/Creativity
How novel is the approach or solution? Is this work a creative solution to a new problem or a new twist on an old theme? Can this approach be applied to a range of problems or is it limited to one particular case? Did the instrumentation or sample force a clever solution to the problem? Is this "me too" science applied to a slightly different problem?

Quality of the Science
Was the experiment performed properly? Can improvements be made either with the science or the technology? Do the data reflect reaching a fundamental limit? What is the confidence that the result is correct? Are the results repeatable and were the results repeated? Are there better methods to solve the same problem? Did the presenter appropriately report any limitations of the methods? If this work is early in development, are there any major hurdles to overcome prior to widespread success? Does the presenter understand the uncertainty of the measurements/methods?

Oral Presentation
Was the oral presentation in alignment with the written abstract? Did the presenter explain the key concept(s) well enough so that a well-educated listener could follow his/her main train of thought? Was the presenter able to keep the audience's attention throughout the presentation? Was the presentation well organized with respect to its look-and-feel (e.g., large enough fonts, suitable colors, readable graphics, etc.)? Was the presentation's content organized in a logical manner? Did the presenter answer questions from the audience in a satisfactory manner? Did the presenter provide the correct amount of background material so that the general ALA audience can understand the subject? Did the audience seem excited by the presentation?
ALA Innovation Award
Judge Scoring System:
5-to-1 Rating Scale


5 — Brilliant, Extraordinary, Outstanding
4 — Very Good, Solid, Sound
3 — Acceptable, Satisfactory, Up-to-Standard
2 — Needs Improvement, Development, Expansion
1 — Inadequate, Poor, Substandard
0 — Unacceptable; Not Applicable


Scoring
Each candidate presentation will be judged on a scale of 1 to 5 (with 5 being the best possible score; integers only). There is a maximum of 20 points possible. The scores of all judges will be consolidated for the final decision. The categories and definition statements are as follows.

Rules & Regulations
The ALA Innovation Award Timeline Cycle:
The ALA Innovation Award panel is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the ALA Board of Directors. The ALA Innovation Award panel of judges will commence activities following the annual timeline below:
Late-September — Review of submitted abstracts
Late-October — Selection of the Top 20 to 25 ALA Innovation Award Candidates

November-December — ALA announces up to the top 10 ALA Innovation Award Finalists

LabAutomation Conference — Top Finalist's Presentations are judged and the selection of the Innovation Award winner is complete

February — Media announcements, JALA follow-up

May — Manuscripts due to JALA for publication

Candidates are encouraged to be members of the association to participate in the contest and/or win the ALA Innovation Award, however membership is not required.

Once selected, each of the Top 20 to 25 Candidates will have the opportunity to submit an extended abstract by October 24th, 2008. The extended abstract will be comprised of no more than two pages, including 2-3 figures of supporting documentation. Upon review of these extended abstracts, the panel will narrow the field to the Innovation Award Finalists, who will compete for the 2009 Innovation Award at LabAutomation2009 in Palm Springs, CA.

All of the Innovation Award Finalists will be required to submit a manuscript to JALA for publication by May 1, 2009. These requirements will be outlined in the Letter of Intent allowing ALA to use the abstracts for press releases and other media announcements.

The panel of judges' reviews only those podium presentations selected and slotted for the conference by the ALA Scientific Committee (not short courses, posters, or plenary presentations). All candidates must adhere to the ALA Abstract Submission policies, timelines, rules and regulations1.

The following list of individuals is not eligible to participate in the ALA Innovation Award program: ALA Board of Directors, officers, the LabAutomation Scientific Committee*, contractors, employees, members of the Judging Panel, family members, and/or those considered to be "insiders." Candidates affiliated with anyone on the Judging Panel are permitted to participate, but the Judge must recuse him or herself from evaluating that particular candidate.

* The LabAutomation Scientific Committee comprises a Chairman, Associate Chairman, Track Chairs and Associate Track Chairs. Session Chairs are not members of the LabAutomation Scientific Committee, and therefore are eligible to participate.

Monetary disbursement — the $10,000 cash prize will be awarded on the final day of the LabAutomation conference and exhibition during the final plenary session. The following rules apply:

The candidate presentation author, a co-author, or a representative must be present to accept the award at the final plenary session.
The $10,000 cash prize is awarded solely to the winning presenting author
Once selected, the Innovation Award Finalists must sign the ALA Letter of Intent recognizing sole responsibility for the cash award and releasing ALA of liability, taxes, candidate employer policies, and any other obligations.
In recognition of the varying employer policies governing employee acceptance of monetary prizes, those employer policies will be recognized and honored by ALA to the extent they are not inconsistent with and do not conflict with ALA policy and/or GAAP. However, ALA will not be responsible or liable for said policies. Winners have the option to decline the monetary award.
The monetary award is not to be considered an obligation of ALA.

Non-Discrimination Statement
Discrimination based on race, religion, gender, age, national origin, ethnicity, veterans status, or disability in regard to the ALA Innovation Award is prohibited. Each candidate shall be evaluated based on the award's criteria which are tied to ALA's exempt purpose of advancing the science and education of technologies in the laboratory.

1Abstract Submission Policy
ALA invites academicians, scientists, and post doctoral and graduate students to submit abstracts for scientific talks and poster presentations for this international educational forum by August 11, 2008. Presentations will be hand-picked by the ALA's scientific committee. Abstracts must include author contact information and must not exceed 250 words. Please do not include references, diagrams, charts, or photographs in your abstract. Use any common font, such as Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier. For complete instructions on abstract submission, see our format instructions page.
Indicate your abstract presentation preference:

Podium
Poster Presentation
Either
All abstracts will be considered for the Innovation Award contest unless otherwise noted by the author.

Please submit the following information:

Presenting author
Organization
Address
Telephone
Fax
E-mail
Co-author(s) and their affiliation(s), if different
Abstract Title
Abstract (see format instructions)
Online abstract updating (Login to the ALA web and update your abstract, add or delete co-authors and more)
Those authors whose abstracts are accepted are responsible for their own travel, lodging and conference registration expenses. Waiver of registration fees will be considered upon request for those requiring financial assistance. Contact Brenda Dreier, ALA's Director of Event Management, at bdreier@labautomation.org for the Financial Assistance Form.

1. Rules, regulations and guidelines are subject to change at the discretion of the ALA Board of Directors in accordance with bylaws, polices, and procedures.

2. ALA reserves the right to select, de-select and/or restrict participation of the Innovation Award Finalists at ACHEMA 2009, May 11-15, Frankfurt, Germany. Financial considerations are not to be considered an obligation of ALA.

Association for Laboratory Automation
330 West State Street, Geneva, Illinois 60134, USA
(P):1.888.733.1ALA (1252) - (F):1.630.578.0172
info@labautomation.org
Laboratory Director, Laboratory Technician, Technologist